tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094176709529713758.post7927084440114428419..comments2024-02-12T19:55:20.018-08:00Comments on 26InchSlicks: Pat's HatsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094176709529713758.post-1527766607312376012013-04-07T12:23:37.072-07:002013-04-07T12:23:37.072-07:00That's a great looking hat. Very light weight ...That's a great looking hat. Very light weight and the weave is amazing. Keep it out of the rain and it should last a long time.Bettyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06506007606138214328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094176709529713758.post-68356799051957176172013-04-07T10:25:40.286-07:002013-04-07T10:25:40.286-07:00Once you whip it, however, it is too late to unwhi...Once you whip it, however, it is too late to unwhip it.<br /><br />Personally, I prefer a simple slogan like "dress right." Though I know some dress left. <br /><br />Too much freedom, maybe. I hear Lance (no pun intended, apparently) has been reduced to marketing Livestrong riding bibs. He calls them Onesies.<br /><br />As for Pat: Raybans and classic porkpie. Elwood or Jake?John Hammbonenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094176709529713758.post-85784025934588449432013-04-06T12:21:49.564-07:002013-04-06T12:21:49.564-07:00The awareness of the awareness unit (i.e. Pat)will...The awareness of the awareness unit (i.e. Pat)will not be actualized by errant questions of the clearness producer. Samples of ineffective answer structures would include Rourke-laced obsenity or the unexpected appearnce of an Italian fatty with a combover.<br /><br />Rather, manHOOD (and its symbols), requires a meticulously phrased question to arrive at appropriate headware responses to denote masculinity.<br /><br />That question is not, then: Are we men?<br /><br />But rather:<br /><br />Are we NOT men?<br /><br />A:<br /><br />en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_dome<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Elron Rubhardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094176709529713758.post-59243142749313409052013-04-06T09:29:13.281-07:002013-04-06T09:29:13.281-07:00Yes, quite. But I believe the binding authority o...Yes, quite. But I believe the binding authority on this issue must be Dr. Cocker, who argues a hat would be nothing--nothing, mind you--without a woman or a girl.<br /><br />Perhaps, even, that the hat is not strictly necessary.<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deLDSH58Bao&feature<br /><br />WARNING: Contains RourkeCarl Hungnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094176709529713758.post-46187478066230115752013-04-06T07:28:01.807-07:002013-04-06T07:28:01.807-07:00Sometimes a hat is just a hat. But this hat all b...Sometimes a hat is just a hat. But this hat all but screams "this is a man's world."<br /><br />http://www.cafediscala.com/2011/03/09/wednesday-james-brown-fix-james-brown-luciano-pavarotti-its-mans-world/Sigmund Roidnoreply@blogger.com